February 2018 Archives by thread
Starting: Thu Feb 1 01:03:31 CST 2018
Ending: Wed Feb 28 21:31:09 CST 2018
Messages: 206
- Internationalised Computer Science Exercises
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Internationalised Computer Science Exercises - Correction
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Cross-Locale Keyboard Features for the General Public
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Fwd: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now final for 2018
Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
- Emoji blooper
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Why so much emoji nonsense?
Erik Pedersen via Unicode
- UNICODE vehicle vanity registration?
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Unicode of Death 2.0
James Kass via Unicode
- Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations
Oren Watson via Unicode
- +1 (was: Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
- metric for block coverage
Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Garth Wallace via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Michael Everson via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
James Kass via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
John W Kennedy via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
David Starner via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Asmus Freytag (c) via Unicode
- Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Coloured Characters
William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- Coloured Characters
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Christoph Päper via Unicode
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
- Suggestions?
Jeb Eldridge via Unicode
- Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic
David Corbett via Unicode
- Missing Kazakh Latin letters (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 20
Neil Patel via Unicode
- Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption!
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
Last message date:
Wed Feb 28 21:31:09 CST 2018
Archived on: Wed Feb 28 21:31:27 CST 2018
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).