December 2020 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Dec 4 06:30:32 CST 2020
Ending: Wed Dec 30 20:45:29 CST 2020
Messages: 128

• A workaround for using colour fonts in some application programs that do not support colour fonts   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Christian Kleineidam
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
    • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Adam Borowski
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
    • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Christian Kleineidam
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Rebecca Bettencourt
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Markus Scherer
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Anshuman Pandey
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
      • Aw: RE: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Marius Spix
      • Aw: RE: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Otto Stolz
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
      • Expressing thoughts in plain text (from Re: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them)   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Julian Bradfield
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   James Kass
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
    • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Richard Wordingham
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Richard Wordingham
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   James Kass
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
    • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Markus Scherer
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Zach Lym
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Zach Lym
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   John W Kennedy
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Frédéric Grosshans
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Harriet Riddle
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
      • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
  • Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
  • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Sławomir Osipiuk
    • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
  • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Richard Wordingham
    • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
      • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Richard Wordingham
      • Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
  • Aw: Re: Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Marius Spix
    • Aw: Re: Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Harriet Riddle
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Roger L Costello
  • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Harriet Riddle
  • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Bill Poser
    • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Markus Scherer
      • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Richard Wordingham
  • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Doug Ewell
    • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Richard Wordingham
      • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Mark E. Shoulson
  • Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Doug Ewell
• 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Fredrick Brennan
  • 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Fredrick Brennan
    • Aw: Re: 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Marius Spix
  • 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Doug Ewell
    • Re: 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Kent Karlsson
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Roger L Costello
  • RE: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Doug Ewell
    • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Mark E. Shoulson
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Markus Scherer
      • Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Asmus Freytag
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   James Kass
  • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   William_J_G Overington
    • Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
  • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
    • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
    • Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Bill Poser
  • Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Doug Ewell
    • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Asmus Freytag
      • Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
    • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Ken Whistler
      • Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
• Interpretation of emoji-ordering-rules.txt   Sudarshan S Chawathe
  • Interpretation of emoji-ordering-rules.txt   Markus Scherer
• Adlam   Fredrick Brennan
  • Adlam   James Kass
• Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   Prof. Pauluk
  • Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   abrahamgross at disroot.org
    • Re: Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   Ken Whistler
      • Re: Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   M. Pauluk

Last message date: Wed Dec 30 20:45:29 CST 2020
Archived on: Wed Dec 30 20:46:14 CST 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...