December 2020 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Dec 4 06:30:32 CST 2020
Ending: Wed Dec 30 20:45:29 CST 2020
Messages: 128

• A workaround for using colour fonts in some application programs that do not support colour fonts   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Christian Kleineidam
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Adam Borowski
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Richard Wordingham
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   James Kass
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Christian Kleineidam
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Anshuman Pandey
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Richard Wordingham
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
• Aw: Re: Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Marius Spix
• Aw: Re: Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Harriet Riddle
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Markus Scherer
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Roger L Costello
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Harriet Riddle
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Rebecca Bettencourt
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Markus Scherer
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Richard Wordingham
• Normalization Generics (NFx, NFKx, NFxy)   Zach Lym
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Zach Lym
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Richard Wordingham
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Bill Poser
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Markus Scherer
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Richard Wordingham
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Fredrick Brennan
• 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Fredrick Brennan
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Mark E. Shoulson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Zach Lym
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   John W Kennedy
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Roger L Costello
• Aw: Re: 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Marius Spix
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Harriet Riddle
• RE: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Doug Ewell
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   William_J_G Overington
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Frédéric Grosshans
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
• Aw: RE: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Marius Spix
• Aw: RE: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Bill Poser
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Mark E. Shoulson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Interpretation of emoji-ordering-rules.txt   Sudarshan S Chawathe
• Interpretation of emoji-ordering-rules.txt   Markus Scherer
• Adlam   Fredrick Brennan
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Otto Stolz
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Doug Ewell
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   David Starner
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Frédéric Grosshans
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Dominikus Dittes Scherkl
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
• Expressing thoughts in plain text (from Re: Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them)   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Ken Whistler
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Asmus Freytag
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   James Kass
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Ken Whistler
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Julian Bradfield
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   William_J_G Overington
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Martin J. Dürst
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Kent Karlsson
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Sławomir Osipiuk
• Italics get used to express important semantic meaning, so unicode should support them   Doug Ewell
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Doug Ewell
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Doug Ewell
• 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Doug Ewell
• Re: 1ˢᵗ, 2ⁿᵈ, 3ʳᵈ, 4ᵗʰ … 9ᵗʰ   Kent Karlsson
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Richard Wordingham
• Is there a difference between converting a string of ASCII digits to an integer versus a string of non-ASCII digits to an integer?   Mark E. Shoulson
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Zach Lym
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Markus Scherer
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   James Kass
• Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Richard Wordingham
• Adlam   James Kass
• Re: Unicode is universal, so how come that universality doesn’t apply to digits?   Asmus Freytag
• Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   Prof. Pauluk
• Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   abrahamgross at disroot.org
• Re: Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   Ken Whistler
• Re: Origins of ⌚ U+231A WATCH and ⌛ U+231B HOURGLASS   M. Pauluk

Last message date: Wed Dec 30 20:45:29 CST 2020
Archived on: Wed Dec 30 20:46:14 CST 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...