normalization: dotless i + COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT doesn't combine to I ACUTE

[Nico Schlömer]

Thanks Denis for the reply.

Indeed, your citation says

>  nor are other cases of accented dotted-i equivalent to accented dotless-i (for example, i + ¨  ı + ¨)

This is what I was looking for.

Cheers,
Nico

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:47 PM Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
<unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
>
> https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ch07.pdf#page=6 explicitly recommends using i + overdot + accent for the forms used in the Baltic.
> Using the Lithuanian locale may or may not work depending on the font, the software or the language tagging, while that character sequence may or may not work depending on the font or the software which is better odds.
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 12:31, Andreas Prilop via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 15 June 2022, Nico Schlömer wrote:
>>
>> > Is it true then that the result of i + COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT
>> > which is LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH ACUTE actually represents a latin
>> > small letter i with dot _and_ acute accent?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> >I had always assumed that it should be dotless.
>>
>> U+0626 likewise has no dots, although U+064A does have two dots below.
>>
>
>
> --
> Denis Moyogo Jacquerye