Difference between Klingon and Tengwar

[Mark E. Shoulson]

On 9/18/21 8:25 PM, Peter Constable via Unicode wrote:
>
> Indeed.
>
> Consider some professional but small type foundry. Are they going to 
> want to create fonts and sell licenses when there’s a question as to 
> whether Paramount might go after them?
>
> Consider a large software / device vendor: will their legal 
> departments sign off on supporting the script?
>
Oh yeah, and this also brings up something else that's important: this 
is a new angle I did not know about before.  If Paramount *had* been 
listening to me or answering me, I probably would not have mentioned 
this in whatever "negotiations" we had or whatever declaration I got 
them to sign.  I've had a vague idea all along of what Unicode wanted, 
and I thought a vague idea was enough, but now I'm not so sure.  If I 
climb the ladder again and actually get Paramount to sign something, I 
don't want to come back here and be told, "nope, we need them to say 
something else."

I'll check the official responses in the minutes and all to see if 
anything really specific was mentioned, but I don't think it was ever 
really spelled out.  Can you tell me what you need them to say?  I 
thought I knew, but it's best to have it out in the open.

~mark

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20210919/d739c8f3/attachment.htm>