Canonical Equivalence Clarification/Normalization Generics
zachlym at indolering.com
Sat Jan 23 21:20:25 CST 2021
I'm kinda a newbie and missed this document  before the UTC meeting and
I wanted to continue discussion here.
I am puzzled that people thought NFx, NFKx, and NFxy would be too
confusing, as I found it in casual usage in discussions at the IETF, Linux,
and W3C. I personally think that it comes quite naturally when
corresponding with others, as it is much shorter to type than
`isCanonicallyEquivalent` and intermixes with NFC/NFD/NFKD/NFKC.
Would there be an isCompatibilityEquivalent as well? What are the plans
for NFx in UAX15?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode