Code2003 is a rip-off
richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Sat Aug 15 20:11:01 CDT 2020
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 23:24:44 +0000
James Kass via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> On 2020-08-15 11:33 AM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
>> Does my licence from
>> you cover me for Code2003 so far as your rights are concerned?
> That question should probably be directed to the developer of
As to his IPR, the SIL Open Font Licence applies.
> Based on the above link and additional
> information, I will certainly attempt to make the acquaintance of the
> Code2003 "developer".
I have confirmed that Code2003's glyphs are unlicensed. St. Gigafont
clearly doesn't understand the different types of 'free'.
> > Bringing the matter more clearly into the scope of this list, is the
> > original goal of Code2000 still achievable? Is it achievable
> > without horrendous artistic compromises?
> I believe it is possible. Not in a single font, of course, unless
> the specs change.
I meant coverage of the assigned BMP in a single font.
More information about the Unicode