Fwd: RFC 8369 on Internationalizing IPv6 Using 128-Bit Unicode
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Tue Apr 3 00:43:27 CDT 2018
On 2018/04/03 10:56, Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode wrote:
> Whew! Thanks for explaining the joke! Everyone here really thought they
> were serious. Maybe you should write to the authors of the RFC and
> explain to them that their growth-function is incorrect. I'm sure
> they'd be glad of the correction.
I'm sure they know they exaggerated quite a bit. I'm also sure they
trust the Unicode Consortium to know when they would have to enlarge the
code space, if every.
Regards, Martin.
More information about the Unicode
mailing list