Fwd: RFC 8369 on Internationalizing IPv6 Using 128-Bit Unicode

Martin J. Dürst via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Tue Apr 3 00:43:27 CDT 2018

On 2018/04/03 10:56, Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode wrote:
> Whew!  Thanks for explaining the joke! Everyone here really thought they 
> were serious.  Maybe you should write to the authors of the RFC and 
> explain to them that their growth-function is incorrect.  I'm sure 
> they'd be glad of the correction.

I'm sure they know they exaggerated quite a bit. I'm also sure they 
trust the Unicode Consortium to know when they would have to enlarge the 
code space, if every.

Regards,   Martin.

More information about the Unicode mailing list