Fwd: RFC 8369 on Internationalizing IPv6 Using 128-Bit Unicode

[Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode]

Whew!  Thanks for explaining the joke! Everyone here really thought they 
were serious.  Maybe you should write to the authors of the RFC and 
explain to them that their growth-function is incorrect.  I'm sure 
they'd be glad of the correction.

~mark

On 04/02/2018 09:49 PM, Philippe Verdy via Unicode wrote:
> It's fun to consider the introdroduction (after emojis) of imojis, 
> amojis, umojis and omojis for individual people (or named pets), alien 
> species (E.T. wants to be able to call home with his own language and 
> script !), unknown things, and obfuscated entities. Also fun for new 
> "trollface" characters. In fact you could represent every individual 
> or even single atom in the universe that has ever created since the 
> BingBang !
>
> But unlike peoples and social entities, characters to encode don't 
> grow exponentially but still linearily at a slowing speed. ....