Gender not specified for some units in "de" -> by design?

[Kip Cole]

Mark, thanks for the response but I admit to some confusion.

As of now, “de” units (length=long) have no “gender” for `dunam`, `karat`, `mole` and some others.  How is gender to be derived for them?

Thanks much, —Kip


> On 23 Feb 2021, at 2:01 am, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato.com> wrote:
> 
> The compound units but are presumed to be derived (the presence for some cases is a holdover, but also useful for testing the compound gender derivation).
> Mark
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:32 AM Kip Cole via CLDR-Users <cldr-users at unicode.org <mailto:cldr-users at unicode.org>> wrote:
> I'm adding support for grammatical features to my libs. Am unsure if the lack of gender in some units for the "de" locale means I should open an issue or if I'm missing something about how these should be handled. Examples (in "de" which has gender for many units):  dunam, karat, mole . There are others like liter-per-kilometer but the gender here can be derived by the rules in grammaticalFeatures  
> 
> Suggestions welcome, especially as to what gender to apply if none is described.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at corp.unicode.org <mailto:CLDR-Users at corp.unicode.org>
> https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users <https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20210223/af83bb79/attachment-0001.htm>