Gender not specified for some units in "de" -> by design?

[Mark Davis ☕️]

I just checked, and for some reason those were not presented in the survey
tool for data collection. Could you file a ticket on that?

Mark


On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:22 PM Kip Cole <kipcole9 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Mark, thanks for the response but I admit to some confusion.
>
> As of now, “de” units (length=long) have no “gender” for `dunam`, `karat`,
> `mole` and some others.  How is gender to be derived for them?
>
> Thanks much, —Kip
>
>
> On 23 Feb 2021, at 2:01 am, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato.com> wrote:
>
> The compound units but are presumed to be derived (the presence for some
> cases is a holdover, but also useful for testing the compound gender
> derivation).
> Mark
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:32 AM Kip Cole via CLDR-Users <
> cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm adding support for grammatical features to my libs. Am unsure if the
>> lack of gender in some units for the "de" locale means I should open an
>> issue or if I'm missing something about how these should be handled.
>> Examples (in "de" which has gender for many units):  dunam, karat, mole .
>> There are others like liter-per-kilometer but the gender here can be
>> derived by the rules in grammaticalFeatures
>>
>> Suggestions welcome, especially as to what gender to apply if none is
>> described.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CLDR-Users mailing list
>> CLDR-Users at corp.unicode.org
>> https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20210222/f4bd703e/attachment.htm>