IPA-ish Tone Diacritics
Denis Jacquerye
moyogo at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 11:05:30 CDT 2025
Hi,
Number 6 was proposed in
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24232-compound-tone-diacritics.pdf as
U+1AEC COMBINING CARON ACUTE and has been provisionally assigned (
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24221.htm#181-C34).
The other numbers 7, 8, 9 seem like candidates for a proposal.
While the sequences of already encoded combining marks can look identical,
they do not always do so and may in fact be in a confusing order,
semantically they are different as well.
Kind regards
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 17:55, Julian Bradfield via Unicode <
unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
> On 2025-06-07, Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org>
> wrote:
> > I've been trying to decipher the tone diacritics used in from jounralk
> > page 157 onwards (page 10 onwards of
> > https://kyoto-seas.org/pdf/7/2/070201.pdf). After massively increasing
> > the magnification of the PDF, I see that three of them (numbers 6
> > 'high-rise', 7 'low-rise' and 8 'high fall') are simply side-by-side
> > combinations of U+0300 COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT 'low', U+0301 COMBINING
> > ACUTE ACCENT, U+0302 COMBINING CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT 'fall' and U+030C
> > COMBINING CARON 'rise'. Does this mean that they *are* encoded, but
> > one 'simply' has to induce the renderer to choose to render them
> > side-by-side rather than stacking them vertically?
>
> TUS says (§3.6) says that by default combining marks above the base
> stack vertically, but they may be side-by-side for a number of
> reasons. So I guess "yes".
>
> > I'm struggling with number 9 'low-fall', which sometimes resembles
> > U+1AB0 COMBINING DOUBLED CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT, but may just be a
> > pixellation effect for for side-by-side <U+0302, U+0300>.
>
> I think it's obvious that it's circumflex and grave - in 6-9 the
> notation is prefixing an acute to indicate a high register, and
> suffixing a grave to indicate low, apart from:
>
> > Number 4 'high-dip' could be U+0303 COMBINING TILDE.
>
> Typographically, it clearly is a tilde. Probably on the grounds that
> acute acute-hacek is too fiddly to typeset
>
>
>
--
Denis Moyogo Jacquerye
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20250607/eeb73951/attachment.htm>
More information about the Unicode
mailing list