Making proposal plans for the UCS for these constructed scripts on Omniglot and Provisionally Assigned Noto Font Ideas

[Asmus Freytag]

On 4/27/2025 4:14 PM, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
> Matthew Tameirao wrote:
>
>> The scripts I'm proposing are constructed scripts from Omniglot for
>> scripts that are needed in the UCS.
> Before writing the formal proposal(s) — which you will need to do for these to even be considered — can you briefly explain why these constructed scripts are “needed in the UCS”?
There's no requirement to explain this here on this list, but a lack of 
a well reasoned and fully documented explanation in a formal proposal 
will doom its success. Not all possible rationales from the perspective 
of a submitter are acceptable from the perspective of the Script 
Encoding Working Group.
>
> The bar is very high for encoding constructed scripts, especially recently invented scripts intended solely, or primarily, for constructed languages.
Indeed.

A./