Proposing new arrow characters with Bidi_Mirrored=Yes

[Nitai Sasson]

On Wednesday, 9 April 2025 at 16:00, Nitai Sasson via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:

> This is getting off-topic, but what could be the source of this difference? I see these possibilities:
>
> - Both implementations have (different) bugs and don't implement the Unicode spec correctly.
> - Unicode specs are vague, and leave room for interpretation in this case
> - Unicode has precise specs about this, one of the implementations is accurate, and the Unicode spec did not properly account for this case
> - This just isn't supposed to work if the font doesn't explicitly support bidi (I hope this is not the case)
>
>>

I just realized that this might be outside the scope of Unicode entirely. I admit I'm a bit out of my depth. This is off-topic anyway.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20250409/79e5f007/attachment.htm>