CJK Extension I question

[James Kass]

On 2023-05-26 10:42 PM, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
>
> A character from the beta review chart at:
> https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-15.1/U151-2EBF0.pdf
>
> U+2EE31 𮸱 ⿰馬匀
>
> This character’s glyph shows the traditional horse radical rather than 
> the simplified.  (馬/马)  Since this is a submission from China, it was 
> surprising to see the traditional form used.  Is this glyph correct?
>
>
Looks as if there are several other places where traditional forms are 
used in Extension I, so the glyph is probably correct.  My impression 
that China only uses simplified forms in new characters appears to be wrong.