[EXT]Re: Why missing characters and empty code points?

[Joao S. O. Bueno]

I think linking charts is not the idea of Unicode - but higher level layers
that would allow one to leverage all the letters are ok.

I happen to be the author of a Python library which has, as one of its
ains, make it easy to use alternate character sets on the terminal -
"terminedia" - the full set of superscript latin letters can be used as
such:

import terminedia as tm
sc = tm.Screen()
sc.print_at((0,0), "Hello World!", effects=tm.Effects.super_script)


Feel free to add issues to the project for character-transforms and pseudo
transports you find lacking (https://github.com/jsbueno/terminedia/issues )

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 2:00 PM admin--- via Unicode <
unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:

> Thanks guys!  Yes the listing of characters I was looking at did not
> include a reference to the code point of the originally-created
> character, 2134 in this case.  I'll be sure to first check the official
> charts on unicode.org in the future.
>
> Amazing this and other previously-created characters have not been
> duplicated, how on earth can you keep track of it all?
>
> Wonder if it is or could be possible in the future to use links in the
> charts, in the same way file systems do?  That way the same character
> would show up in 2134 and 1D4C4 but only exist physically in one space...
>
> Best,
> Chandler
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20230525/f2f94946/attachment.htm>