Lucida Sans Unicode & Hebrew Hyphen Maqaf
Erwin Denissen
erwin.denissen at high-logic.com
Wed May 4 16:36:31 CDT 2022
> I have version 5.01 of Lucida Sans Unicode, April 15, 1993; I’m not sure
> whether the difference matters.
Sorry about the confusion; I also have 5.01.
> I tend to agree. Looking at U+05BE in Lucida Sans Unicode in the OTM
> Light font inspector, I see ADW (advance width) as 0. This is of course
> a bug in the font, and it causes the character to be overprinted on the
> preceding character. When it is beth, you don’t really see it.
Actually the AW is 862, but since the glyph is set as being a mark, it
is forced to zero.
You can clearly see (and fix) this in a font editor.
Best regards,
Erwin Denissen
High-Logic
http://www.high-logic.com/
On 04-May-22 7:12 PM, Jukka K. Korpela via Unicode wrote:
> Erwin Denissen via Unicode (unicode at corp.unicode.org
> <mailto:unicode at corp.unicode.org>) kirjoitti:
>
>
> I have version 5.10 updated March 3, 2017.
>
>
> I have version 5.01 of Lucida Sans Unicode, April 15, 1993; I’m not sure
> whether the difference matters.
>
>
> maqaf-hebr is placed over bet-hebr (you see it when you use a large
> font
> size) as it is defined as mark in the font while it should be a base.
>
>
> I tend to agree. Looking at U+05BE in Lucida Sans Unicode in the OTM
> Light font inspector, I see ADW (advance width) as 0. This is of course
> a bug in the font, and it causes the character to be overprinted on the
> preceding character. When it is beth, you don’t really see it.
>
> Yucca, http://jkorpela.fi <http://jkorpela.fi>
>
More information about the Unicode
mailing list