Tengwar on a general purpose translation site

[Steve Downey]

But standards are pretty much the definition of conventional.
We have plenty of solutions, even within the Unicode framework, for high
quality private agreements.

Doing a bad job of standardization just makes life worse for everyone.  And
probably still gets the Consortium sued, and losing, setting a terrible
precedent.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022, 01:10 James Kass via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2022-03-16 3:01 AM, Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode wrote:
> > An updated proposal for serious consideration, then, could only happen
> > after IP issues are resolved (if ever.)
>
> Or until someone comes up with an unconventional approach and makes it
> palatable.  Be aware, though, that anyone cheeky enough to suggest an
> unconventional approach will immediately get sniped at from all sides --
> even from those who desire progress towards standardization -- simply
> *because* the approach is unconventional.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20220316/8848c7ce/attachment.htm>