Re Tengwar on a general purpose translation site

Julian Bradfield junicode at
Mon Mar 7 13:04:11 CST 2022

On 2022-03-07, stas via Unicode <unicode at> wrote:
>  On Monday, March 7, 2022, 11:21:43 PM GMT+6, Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode at> wrote:
>> An updated proposal for Tengwar that claims it is being used for more than just decoration (a traditional argument against encoding Klingon pIqaD) may need to be supported with better language tools than this.
> I disagree. The mere need to display Tengwar should be enough, even if it is "just" for a dictionary.

It doesn't matter what you think about this. What matters is what the
Tolkien Estate thinks about copyright, and they don't want tengwar in

More information about the Unicode mailing list