Re Tengwar on a general purpose translation site
junicode at jcbradfield.org
Mon Mar 7 13:04:11 CST 2022
On 2022-03-07, stas via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2022, 11:21:43 PM GMT+6, Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
>> An updated proposal for Tengwar that claims it is being used for more than just decoration (a traditional argument against encoding Klingon pIqaD) may need to be supported with better language tools than this.
> I disagree. The mere need to display Tengwar should be enough, even if it is "just" for a dictionary.
It doesn't matter what you think about this. What matters is what the
Tolkien Estate thinks about copyright, and they don't want tengwar in
More information about the Unicode