Unicode 14.0.0 (was: Re: Difference between Klingon and Tengwar)
Doug Ewell
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Sep 17 09:25:17 CDT 2021
Looks like this has been fixed.
--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Unicore <unicore-bounces at corp.unicode.org> On Behalf Of Martin J. Dürst via Unicore
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 0:17
To: UTC Discussion <unicore at corp.unicode.org>
Subject: Fwd: Unicode 14.0.0 (was: Re: Difference between Klingon and Tengwar)
I didn't get any answer to my comments below. On the unicoDe list, people are apparently more interested in discussing Klingon than Unicode 14.0.0. I'm redirecting this to unicoRe in the hope I get an answer here.
Regards, Martin.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Unicode 14.0.0 (was: Re: Difference between Klingon and Tengwar)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:28:19 +0900
From: Martin J. Dürst via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org>
Reply-To: Martin J. Dürst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
To: unicode at corp.unicode.org
Hello Doug, others,
On 2021-09-15 14:04, Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
> First, congratulations on the release of Unicode 14.0, the first new release since the pandemic in the Western Hemisphere began, if we can even imagine that.
The official announcement is at
https://home.unicode.org/announcing-the-unicode-standard-version-14-0/.
But one of the links points to
http://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts-14.0/emoji-counts.html,
which as of this wringing has a big red beta in its title (Emoji Counts, v14.0β For the current released version, see v13.1.).
Also, the official announcement doesn't point to the version of the standard itself (http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/).
I also miss announcements sent out by mail.
Maybe we can blame this on California's recall election :-?
Regards, Martin.
> Asmus Freytag wrote:
>
>> Strong evidence of widespread use and strong evidence that can
>> support the supposition that this use will not be a flash in the pan,
>> but continue for decades.
>
> U+1FAF6 HEART HANDS
>
> I don't believe UTC could approve a more frivolous and flash-in-the-pan character if it tried.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
.
More information about the Unicode
mailing list