Encoding ConScripts

[William_J_G Overington]

As this appears to be about Ewellic, and it comes up as tofu boxes here, 
could there possibly be some graphics posted please?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewellic_alphabet 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewellic_alphabet>

William Overington

Wednesday 13 October 2021

------ Original Message ------
From: "Doug Ewell via Unicode" <unicode at corp.unicode.org>
To: unicode at corp.unicode.org
Cc: "'James Kass'" <jameskass at code2001.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 2021 Oct 13 At 16:22
Subject: RE: Encoding ConScripts
OK, James forced me into this thread.
Well, obviously it should be 𐑌𐐨𐐪𐑀𐑉𐐲𐑁𐐨. Or, if you prefer, 
𐑯𐑰𐑭𐑜𐑮𐑩𐑓𐑰.
Or even  / .
Pronunciation of newly coined English words is notoriously 
unstandardized, but I agree with those who notice the similarity between 
"geography" (which I pronounce /ʤiːˈɑːɡɹəfiː/) and "neography" (hence 
/niːˈɑːɡɹəfiː/). There's no /oː/ as in "go" in either of these words, 
not for me anyway.
So the latter would be ́, or really ́ as the schwa 
should be used minimally. Don't forget the accent on multi-syllable 
words.
This is probably not much farther out of scope than some other recent 
posts.
--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20211013/bd5964ac/attachment.htm>