New CJK characters

[abrahamgross at disroot.org]

Sutton Signwriting is completely compositional, and yet it was encoded despite all the downfalls

2021/11/03 午後6:19:32 john_h_jenkins via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org>:

> 
> This is actually touched on in TUS (§ 18.2) and the FAQ (Why doesn't the Unicode Standard adopt a compositional model for encoding Han ideographs? Wouldn't that save a large number of code points?). Outside of the momentum issue mentioned, compositional methods don’t work because of “spelling” ambiguity and failure to address issues such as collation, text-to-speech, searching, semantic analysis—basically, everything you want to use text for *other* than rendering. Even in rendering, you aren’t covering the region-specific shapes, at least not with IDS.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20211103/c62c8ce2/attachment.htm>