Grantha encoding question

[James Kass]

Thank you.  Your question seems to have answered mine.

If nobody can produce exhibits, then it makes sense that these 
characters weren't included in the Standard.

Meanwhile I've removed these glyphs and their associated ligatures from 
the font I'm trying to update.  If they ever get proposed and accepted, 
the glyphs can be reinstated.

On 2020-09-10 1:21 PM, Cibu wrote:
> I am curious whether you would see them in Grantha texts. If yes, could you
> provide some examples?
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:02 PM James Kass via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org>
> wrote:
>
>> In preliminary Grantha encoding proposals there were characters which
>> don't seem to have been accepted into the Standard.
>>
>> What is the recommended encoding for the Grantha letters NNNA, RRA, and
>> LLLA/ZHA?  (Originally proposed for U+11329, U+11331, and U+11334
>> respectively.)
>>
>> Here's a link to one of the earlier proposals:
>> https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2010/10426-grantha-proposal.pdf
>>
>> A graphic is attached showing the three characters.
>>