Please fix the trademark policy in regards to code
William_J_G Overington
wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com
Tue Oct 20 17:19:13 CDT 2020
I am not a lawyer, but I seem to remember something in United Kingdom
Patent Law that, whilst not the same issue as here, may have a sort of
resonant parallel.
There is something about there being no legal force in declaring upon an
object or in literature describing the object that the object is
patented unless the registration number of the patent is also stated.
So, is it reasonable for Unicode, Inc. to request or require on a web
page for people to repeat a statement that Unicode is a registered
trademark when Unicode, Inc. does not provide any checkable evidence
upon that web page that that is the case?
If a person does state that message and is then challenged to prove that
claim how does the person do that?
I remember a magazine editor saying that the magazine, when reporting
the content of a press release from a business about a new product, and
what it could do, that the magazine would always list statements in the
press release as "claims",
People may well have no reason to doubt the truth of the claims that
Unicode Inc. makes about trade mark registration, but that is not the
same as people being requested or required to repeat those claims as if
fact without checkable evidence before them.
William Overington
Tuesday 20 October 2020
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20201020/a4e2ffe3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Unicode
mailing list