Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Is Devanagari ल्लाँ ambiguous?

[Andrew Glass]

Thank you Richard,

I'll update our Indic engine documentation using the issue you created.

Andrew


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>

________________________________
From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:43 AM
To: Andrew Glass <Andrew.Glass at microsoft.com>
Cc: unicode at unicode.org <unicode at unicode.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Is Devanagari ल्लाँ ambiguous?

On Thu, 7 May 2020 22:38:22 +0000
Andrew Glass <Andrew.Glass at microsoft.com> wrote:

> Good question. We support Devanagari with our Indic engine, a
> peculiarity of this engine is that it doesn’t have a per-run feature
> application stage and all features are applied at the cluster stage.
> Addressing this is an outstanding issue. Therefore, the example
> cluster is a permitted single cluster in our Indic engine.

Thanks for the information.  I have now raised the HarfBuzz bug as
Issue 2392 (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fharfbuzz%2Fharfbuzz%2Fissues%2F2392&data=02%7C01%7Candrew.glass%40microsoft.com%7Cde47f583c43246588de808d7f3344c0d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637245278924290476&sdata=ZpC6yhI8CyE4bavmisceTLfjj3SiwjtZraL6pEqHpPQ%3D&reserved=0) and have
made comment number 416 for the Microsoft typography Devanagari
specification, currently at
https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Ftypography%2Fscript-development%2Fdevanagari&data=02%7C01%7Candrew.glass%40microsoft.com%7Cde47f583c43246588de808d7f3344c0d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637245278924290476&sdata=Cy1VDE5VyxwtL686U%2BuATucaEuWpA2vfrK6y41JduPE%3D&reserved=0 .

Richard.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/private/unicode/attachments/20200508/bd225e50/attachment.htm>