I think james used ␈ as an example, and not as a real proposal for what overstrike should look like where its its not supported. (‹m↶l› or ‹m￩l› might be a good alternative) 2020/06/19 午前10:43:03 Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org>: > Wouldn't this violate the character identity of U+2408? >