firstname.lastname@example.org via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Fri Jan 25 03:06:35 CST 2019
Asmus Freytag wrote;
> Other schemes, like a VS per code point, also suffer from being
> different in philosophy from "standard" rich text approaches. Best
> would be as standard extension to all the messaging systems (e.g. a
> common markdown language, supported by UI). A./
Yet that claim of what would be best would be stateful and statefulness
is the very thing that Unicode seeks to avoid.
Plain text is the basic system and a Variation Selector mechanism after
each character that is to become italicized is not stateful and can be
implemented using existing OpenType technology.
If an organization chooses to develop and use a rich text format then
that is a matter for that organization and any changing of formatting of
how italics are done when converting between plain text and rich text is
the responsibility of the organization that introduces its rich text
Twitter was just an example that someone introduced along the way, it
was not the original request.
Also this is not only about messaging. Of primary importance is the
conservation of texts in plain text format, for example, where a printed
book has one word italicized in a sentence and the text is being
transcribed into a computer.
Friday 25 January 2019
More information about the Unicode