Proposal to add Roman transliteration schemes to ISO 15924.

[Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode]

Filed the following, thanks Richard.
CLDR-13445 <https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-13445>

Release link for "latest" goes to zip file
<https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-13445>



<https://unicode-org.atlassian.net/browse/CLDR-13445>



On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:31 AM Richard Wordingham via Unicode <
unicode at unicode.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 09:09:02 -0800
> Markus Scherer via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:42 AM Roozbeh Pournader via Unicode <
> > unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> >
> > > You don't need an ISO 15924 script code. You need to think in terms
> > > of BCP 47. Sanskrit in Latin would be sa-Latn.
> > >
> >
> > Right!
> >
> > Now, if you want to distinguish the different transcription systems
> > for
> > > writing Sanskrit in Latin, you can apply to registry a BCP 47
> > > variant. There are also BCP 47 extension T, which may also be
> > > useful to you:
> > >
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6497
> > >
> >
> > And that extension is administered by Unicode, with documentation and
> > data here:
> > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35.html#t_Extension
>
> But that says that the definitions are at
>
> https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/releases/tag/latest/common/bcp47/transform.xml
> ,
> but all one currently gets from that is an error message 'XML Parsing
> Error: no element found'.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20191203/feea9f17/attachment.html>