A sign/abbreviation for "magister"
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Fri Nov 2 00:44:35 CDT 2018
On Thu, Nov 01 2018 at 13:34 -0700, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote:
> On 11/1/2018 10:23 AM, Janusz S. Bień via Unicode wrote:
> Looks like you completely missed my point. Nobody ever claimed that
> reproducing all variations in manuscripts is in scope of Unicode, so
> whom do you want to convince that it is not?
> Looks like you are missing my point about there being a continuum with
> not clear lines that can be perfectly drawn a-priori.
Why do you think so? There is nothing in my posts which can be used to
support your claim. Perhaps you confused me with some other poster?
Janusz S. Bien
More information about the Unicode