A sign/abbreviation for "magister"
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Thu Nov 1 16:56:06 CDT 2018
On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:23:05 +0100
"Janusz S. Bień via Unicode" <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01 2018 at 8:43 -0700, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote:
> > I don't think it's a joke to recognize that there is a continuum
> > here and that there is no line that can be drawn which is based on
> > straightforward principles. This is a pattern that keeps surfacing
> > the deeper you look at character coding questions.
> Looks like you completely missed my point. Nobody ever claimed that
> reproducing all variations in manuscripts is in scope of Unicode, so
> whom do you want to convince that it is not?
I think the counter-claim is that one will never be able to encode all
the meaning-conveying distinctions of text in Unicode.
More information about the Unicode