The Unicode Standard and ISO

Thu May 17 18:29:36 CDT 2018

It would be great if mutual synchronization were considered to be of benefit. Some of us in SC2 are not happy that the Unicode Consortium has published characters which are still under Technical ballot. And this did not happen only once.

> On 17 May 2018, at 23:26, Peter Constable via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> 
> Hence, from an ISO perspective, ISO 10646 is the only standard for which on-going synchronization with Unicode is needed or relevant.