Thoughts on working with the Emoji Subcommittee (was Re: Thoughts on Emoji Selection Process)

[James Kass via Unicode]

Rebecca Bettencourt wrote,

> Why don't we just get Blissymbolics encoded as it is?

The Pipeline still has the Everson proposal from 1998, but Blissymbols
are still in the Pipeline.

Scripts Encoding Initiative
( http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/ )
 page,
http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/scripts-not-encoded.html
shows Blissymbols and links the same proposal.

Blissymbolics Communication International,
http://www.blissymbolics.org/
will likely produce the next proposal.

Both Scripts Encoding Initiative and Blissymbolics Communication
International depend upon funding.