Case for letters j and J with acute

[Philippe Verdy]

Fixed it in Wikipedia (I used "canonically equivalent" and linked it to the
relevant article, instead of the imprecise expression "the result of").

2016-02-09 20:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Scherer <markus.icu at gmail.com>:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:18 AM, ACJ Unicode <unicode at acjs.net> wrote:
>
>> [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IJ_(digraph)#Stress
>>
>
> This says "in Unicode <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode> it is
> possible to combine characters
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combining_character>into a *j* with an
> acute accent – "bíȷ́na" – though this might not be supported or rendered
> correctly by some fonts <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_font> or
> systems. This *ȷ́* is the result of the combination of the dotless *ȷ* (U+0237)
> and the combining acute accent  ́ (U+0301)."
>
> which I am pretty sure is wrong. It should read "in Unicode
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode> it is possible to combine
> characters <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combining_character>into a *j* with
> an acute accent – "bíj́na" – though this might not be supported or
> rendered correctly by some fonts
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_font> or systems. This *j́* is
> the result of the combination of the regular *j* and the combining acute
> accent  ́ (U+0301)."
>
> Could someone with Wikipedia edit experience please fix this? (3 edits in
> the sentence)
>
> markus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20160209/e128164a/attachment.html>