PRI #299 (was: Re: Adding RAINBOW FLAG to Unicode)
doug at ewellic.org
Fri Jul 3 14:50:51 CDT 2015
Leo Broukhis <leob at mailcom dot com> wrote:
> What I don't like about PRI #399 is its proposing to use default-
> ignorable characters. On a non-vexillology-aware platform, I'd like
> to see something informative, albeit not resembling a flag, but
> indicative of the intention to display a flag, like RIS can be, as
> opposed to nondescript white flags.
This is just a personal prediction, but I'd guess that once the PRI #299
mechanism hits the streets, U+1F3F3 WAVING WHITE FLAG will be used
overwhelmingly for tag sequences and comparatively seldom on its own.
When a reader sees , it might be relatively safe to assume the writer
intended to display a specific flag.
I don't know what the original impetus for adding U+1F3F3 was. That
might help us predict how popular U+1F3F3 will be on its own. Maybe one
of the Emoji Gurus can help out here.
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO
More information about the Unicode