New Unicode Emoji draft, available for review

[Shervin Afshar]

>
> I forwarded this on, and the only response I got was a question regarding
> if the Fitzpatrick modifiers applied to U+1F4A9?  I answered that they only
> apply to specified emoji.  But I wonder if the question was in fact a
> commentary on what they think of the proposal.
>

Oh...I think that question is already answered by another emoji which -
unlike 1F4A9  - is actually fitz-optional[1].

[1]:
http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/1.0/emoji-annotations.html#fitz-optional


↪ Shervin

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Karl Williamson <public at khwilliamson.com>
wrote:

> On 11/03/2014 08:17 PM, announcements at unicode.org wrote:
>
>> egg hatching emoji The Unicode Consortium has released the draft
>> “Unicode Emoji <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/tr51-1.html>”
>> document, whose main goal is to help improve the interoperability of
>> emoji characters across implementations by providing guidelines and data.
>>
>> This draft document also includes a section on Diversity, with a
>> mechanism using 5 new proposed characters to provide a variety of skin
>> tones for existing emoji characters.
>>
>> tr51 table 2-2
>>
>> The document is in “Proposed Draft” state, and made available for public
>> review and comment.
>>
>> http://unicode-inc.blogspot.com/2014/11/new-unicode-emoji-
>> draft-available-for.html
>>
>>
>
> I forwarded this on, and the only response I got was a question regarding
> if the Fitzpatrick modifiers applied to U+1F4A9?  I answered that they only
> apply to specified emoji.  But I wonder if the question was in fact a
> commentary on what they think of the proposal.
> _______________________________________________
> Unicode mailing list
> Unicode at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20141105/5b79e9ba/attachment.html>