New Unicode Emoji draft, available for review

[Rick McGowan]

FYI, Posting this on behalf of Mark Davis... Something in his original 
reply message is apparently toxic to our mail gateway that it can't get 
through. (Investigating.)

May be the literal U+1F4A9, which I have (I'm sorry) redacted below.

     Rick

------------

 > Could be either one [U+1F4A9]
 >
 > The exact contents of minimal and optional characters is something 
that we
 > want to get feedback on. But I don't think [U+1F4A9] is in the running!
 >
 > BTW, I'm seeing about 250 new news articles on this, per hour (in 
English).
 > https://www.google.com/search?q=emoji+unicode&tbm=nws&tbs=qdr:h
 >
 > Plus a scattering of others, s.a.
 > 
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/unicode-consortium-emojis-demnaechst-fuer-alle-hautfarben-a-1001125.html