Sardinian in CLDR releases

[Mark Davis ☕️]

That may be sufficient. Could you make a ticket with background information
including links to web pages by and/or about the association? Especially
useful would be if your social is recognized or cited by a regional
Sardinian governmental agency.

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 03:55 lmelonimamo <lmelonimamo at protonmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately there is no such organization for Sardinian right now. I'm
> part of an association, Sardware, that works for the promotion of Sardinian
> by translating software and creating translation memories (like Softcatalà
> does for Catalan, to make an analogy), but I don't know if that could be
> enough.
>
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Thursday, November 19, 2020 11:09 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato.com>
> wrote:
>
> On that release note, we selected languages that had shown the most change.
>
> That being said, here are a few comments about Sardinian.
>
>    1. A main factor is whether enough data has been confirmed at a Basic
>    level, which is assessed according to
>    http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#TOC-Draft-Status-of-Optimal-Field-Value.
>    To improve that, we'd typically need the additional involvement of an
>    organization that is a recognized authority on a language. This can be a
>    university, government agency, or similar institution. If there are any
>    such organizations for Sardinian.
>    2. There is a project this cycle of reforming the way we measure
>    coverage (which is visible on
>    https://unicode-org.github.io/cldr-staging/charts/38/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#sc)
>    that should improve the Basic scores for some languages.
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:43 AM lmelonimamo via CLDR-Users <
> cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Reading the CLDR 38 release note, I've noted that some languages have
>> been added to it even while being at a Basic or Moderate level. Meanwhile,
>> Sardinian seems to be missing even if it only needs the emoji characters to
>> reach the Modern level. Could I ask you why is that? What should be done to
>> add it as well?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Luca
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CLDR-Users mailing list
>> CLDR-Users at corp.unicode.org
>> https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20201120/eb5e451c/attachment.htm>