Sardinian in CLDR releases

[Mark Davis ☕️]

On that release note, we selected languages that had shown the most change.

That being said, here are a few comments about Sardinian.

   1. A main factor is whether enough data has been confirmed at a Basic
   level, which is assessed according to
   http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#TOC-Draft-Status-of-Optimal-Field-Value.
   To improve that, we'd typically need the additional involvement of an
   organization that is a recognized authority on a language. This can be a
   university, government agency, or similar institution. If there are any
   such organizations for Sardinian.
   2. There is a project this cycle of reforming the way we measure
   coverage (which is visible on
   https://unicode-org.github.io/cldr-staging/charts/38/supplemental/locale_coverage.html#sc)
   that should improve the Basic scores for some languages.

Mark


On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:43 AM lmelonimamo via CLDR-Users <
cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> Reading the CLDR 38 release note, I've noted that some languages have been
> added to it even while being at a Basic or Moderate level. Meanwhile,
> Sardinian seems to be missing even if it only needs the emoji characters to
> reach the Modern level. Could I ask you why is that? What should be done to
> add it as well?
>
> Best regards,
> Luca
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at corp.unicode.org
> https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20201119/0c67b368/attachment.htm>