Interpretation of pi-LA (Pali as in Laos)

[Mark Davis ☕️ via CLDR-Users]

I added the other two as comments to
https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/11603, since they are all related (and
you can't post for some reason).

Mark


On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:53 AM Richard Wordingham via CLDR-Users <
cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:

> As I appear to be a robot*, I request that the CLDR developers please
> address the issues below:
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 18:13:22 +0100
> Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > There were a couple of entries in there that surprised me and I
> > still think the scripts are wrong in a few of these cases.  Is there
> > any straightforward way of checking how they were derived?  They are:
> >
> > sga => sga_Ogam_IE ! Surely Latn is the main script for Old Irish
> >                    ! (unless you want to count Latg)
> > non => non_Runr_SE ! I think Latn, but perhaps it depends on how you
> >                    ! measure usage.  I understood that most of the Old
> >                    ! Norse material came from Iceland.
> > nod => nod_Lana_TH ! I think Thai - unless there has been a major
> > shift ! recently.
>
> The case of Northern Thai appears likely be addressed by ticket #11603.
>
> Richard.
>
> *Robots are still not allowed to submit tickets, so don't ask.
>
> P.S.  I can't find my serial number or product number, so not quoted.
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20190111/e7f4bcf1/attachment.html>