bh & bho macro relationship

[Doug Ewell via CLDR-Users]

Martin Hosken wrote:

> That sort of makes sense. But here I am talking about entries in
> languageAlias for macrolanguage folding. Where two different
> sublanguages fold to the same macro language.

I wish I understood how CLDR uses the term "macrolanguage", because it
apparently has nothing to do with how ISO 639-3 or BCP 47 use it.

In BCP 47, neither 'bh' ("Bihari languages") nor 'bho' ("Bhojpuri") is a
macrolanguage, nor is either encompassed by one.
 
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org