Keyboards PRI #367 issues

Marcel Schneider via CLDR-Users cldr-users at unicode.org
Thu Feb 8 13:22:15 CST 2018


Hi Steven,

Thank you.

Anyway I havenʼt finished yet, neither, am still editing.

Regards,

Marcel

On 08/02/18 18:38, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
> 
>
Hello, welcome to the CLDR Users list!

>
> After having posted some feedback for PRI #367, Iʼm now bothered that one ticket is still unaccepted, although it contains indispensable features:

>
There's no reason to be bothered. The ticket is in the right place. The ticket hasn't been rejected, just not accepted yet. 


>
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Marcel Schneider via CLDR-Users  wrote:
>

> Hello,
> 
> just joined CLDR-Users at Sarasvatiʼs invitation:
> http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2018-m01/0193.html
> 
> After having posted some feedback for PRI #367,
> Iʼm now bothered that one ticket is still unaccepted,
> although it contains indispensable features:
> 
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10898
> 
> And that another ticket with editorial feedback is
> unaccepted:
> 
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10901
> 
> …while its fellow editorial feedback (non-PRI) has
> been accepted:
> 
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10906
> 
> Any hints about whatʼs wrong and how to improve
> are highly welcome.
> 
> CLDR and part 7 of UTS #35 seem to be the only
> de facto industrial standard for keyboard layouts
> that is actually taken into account by the industry.
> Therefore it is important that all necessary features
> do make it into UTS #35-7.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Marcel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>


>



More information about the CLDR-Users mailing list