Keyboards PRI #367 issues

Steven R. Loomis via CLDR-Users cldr-users at unicode.org
Thu Feb 8 11:38:25 CST 2018


Hello, welcome to the CLDR Users list!

> After having posted some feedback for PRI #367, Iʼm now bothered that one
ticket is still unaccepted, although it contains indispensable features:

There's no reason to be bothered. The ticket is in the right place. The
ticket hasn't been rejected, just not accepted yet.


On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Marcel Schneider via CLDR-Users <
cldr-users at unicode.org> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> just joined CLDR-Users at Sarasvatiʼs invitation:
> http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2018-m01/0193.html
>
> After having posted some feedback for PRI #367,
> Iʼm now bothered that one ticket is still unaccepted,
> although it contains indispensable features:
>
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10898
>
> And that another ticket with editorial feedback is
> unaccepted:
>
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10901
>
> …while its fellow editorial feedback (non-PRI) has
> been accepted:
>
> https://unicode.org/cldr/trac/ticket/10906
>
> Any hints about whatʼs wrong and how to improve
> are highly welcome.
>
> CLDR and part 7 of UTS #35 seem to be the only
> de facto industrial standard for keyboard layouts
> that is actually taken into account by the industry.
> Therefore it is important that all necessary features
> do make it into UTS #35-7.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marcel
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20180208/b02d533c/attachment.html>


More information about the CLDR-Users mailing list