Ordinal endings

[Kent Karlsson]

Den 2016-02-28 21:16, skrev "Mark Davis" <mark at macchiato.com>:

> There are RBNF ordinal rules for some languages, but the RBNF rules are not
> complete for all languages; and for some languages that have them, they are
> not complete for all of the inflected forms.

For the short form of ordinals, many languages "duck" that and just put a
period after the sequence of digits.
That is why that form ("<digits>.") of short ordinals is default (in root
locale) in CLDR/RBNF.

/Kent Karlsson

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20160228/67e80951/attachment.html>