4 Votes

[Mjbmr]

Actually I wasn't talking about any specific language.

So if that's true, why didn't you tell me at the first time so I 
wouldn't waster my time on contacting people?

I'm sure we don't have high value vote people in Unicode organizations 
from all languages. Better be another choice, like a wiki would be better.

On 5/16/2015 10:08 PM, Shervin Afshar wrote:
> TC = Technical Committee. Unicode Consortium member organizations are 
> listed at: http://www.unicode.org/consortium/members.html
>
>     So why 4 guest vote won't get the item approved?
>
>
> All four of Northern Luri contributors are in the same organization 
> ("guest") and therefore:
>
>     For each value, each organization gets a vote based on the maximum
>     (not cumulative) strength of the votes of its users who voted on
>     that item. That is, even if an organization has 10 Vetters voting
>     for an value, if the highest level is regular vetter, then the
>     vote count attributed to the organization as a whole is 4.
>
>
> http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#TOC-Voting-Process
>
>
> ↪ Shervin
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Mjbmr <mjbmri at gmail.com 
> <mailto:mjbmri at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     So why 4 guest vote won't get the item approved?
>
>     What's the "TC"?
>
>     Who are the members of unicode organization?
>
>
>     On 5/12/2015 9:15 PM, John Emmons wrote:
>>     Depending on the level of account you have, most things will fall
>>     into one of the following buckets:
>>
>>     Guest accounts receive 1 vote.  Any data item with only 1 vote
>>     will stlil go into CLDR as draft="unconfirmed".
>>
>>     Regular vetter accounts from Unicode member organizations receive
>>     4 votes.  Most locales in CLDR only require 4 votes for the item
>>     to be draft="approved" ( which is the meaning when no draft
>>     status is specifically mentioned in the data ).  The only
>>     exceptions to this are the "high visibility" locales, ( examples
>>     would include things like German, French, Arabic, or Chinese ).
>>      For these locales, 8 votes are required in order to make a
>>     change ( 2 set of eyes from 2 different organizations ).
>>
>>     TC member accounts receive 20 votes, and are used only to resolve
>>     disputes when necessary, and also to vote on high visibility
>>     items that require a TC review.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     John C. Emmons
>>     Globalization Architect & Unicode CLDR TC Chairman
>>     IBM Software Group
>>     Internet: emmo at us.ibm.com <mailto:emmo at us.ibm.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     From: Mjbmr <mjbmri at gmail.com> <mailto:mjbmri at gmail.com>
>>     To: Shervin Afshar <shervinafshar at gmail.com>
>>     <mailto:shervinafshar at gmail.com>
>>     Cc: cldr-users at unicode.org <mailto:cldr-users at unicode.org>
>>     Date: 05/11/2015 12:20 PM
>>     Subject: Re: 4 Votes
>>     Sent by: "CLDR-Users" <cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org>
>>     <mailto:cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>     I asked "will" they be removed? and by that I mean will they get
>>     into svn repos or not?
>>
>>     On 5/11/2015 9:43 PM, Shervin Afshar wrote:
>>     They are not removed. If I'm not mistaken in interpreting the
>>     resolution rules[1], they end up being marked as "provisional".
>>
>>     [1]: _http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#resolution_procedure_
>>
>>     ↪ Shervin
>>
>>     On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Mjbmr <_mjbmri at gmail.com_
>>     <mailto:mjbmri at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     If we don't reach 4 votes till the end of ST close time, will
>>     they be removed?
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     CLDR-Users mailing list_
>>     __CLDR-Users at unicode.org_ <mailto:CLDR-Users at unicode.org>_
>>     __http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users_
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     CLDR-Users mailing list
>>     CLDR-Users at unicode.org <mailto:CLDR-Users at unicode.org>
>>     http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20150516/4035b981/attachment-0001.html>