4 Votes

[Shervin Afshar]

TC = Technical Committee. Unicode Consortium member organizations are
listed at: http://www.unicode.org/consortium/members.html

So why 4 guest vote won't get the item approved?


All four of Northern Luri contributors are in the same organization
("guest") and therefore:

For each value, each organization gets a vote based on the maximum (not
> cumulative) strength of the votes of its users who voted on that item. That
> is, even if an organization has 10 Vetters voting for an value, if the
> highest level is regular vetter, then the vote count attributed to the
> organization as a whole is 4.


 http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#TOC-Voting-Process


↪ Shervin

On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Mjbmr <mjbmri at gmail.com> wrote:

>  So why 4 guest vote won't get the item approved?
>
> What's the "TC"?
>
> Who are the members of unicode organization?
>
>
> On 5/12/2015 9:15 PM, John Emmons wrote:
>
> Depending on the level of account you have, most things will fall into one
> of the following buckets:
>
> Guest accounts receive 1 vote.  Any data item with only 1 vote will stlil
> go into CLDR as draft="unconfirmed".
>
> Regular vetter accounts from Unicode member organizations receive 4
> votes.  Most locales in CLDR only require 4 votes for the item to be
> draft="approved" ( which is the meaning when no draft status is
> specifically mentioned in the data ).  The only exceptions to this are the
> "high visibility" locales, ( examples would include things like German,
> French, Arabic, or Chinese ).  For these locales, 8 votes are required in
> order to make a change ( 2 set of eyes from 2 different organizations ).
>
> TC member accounts receive 20 votes, and are used only to resolve disputes
> when necessary, and also to vote on high visibility items that require a TC
> review.
>
> Regards,
>
> John C. Emmons
> Globalization Architect & Unicode CLDR TC Chairman
> IBM Software Group
> Internet: emmo at us.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
> From:        Mjbmr <mjbmri at gmail.com> <mjbmri at gmail.com>
> To:        Shervin Afshar <shervinafshar at gmail.com>
> <shervinafshar at gmail.com>
> Cc:        cldr-users at unicode.org
> Date:        05/11/2015 12:20 PM
> Subject:        Re: 4 Votes
> Sent by:        "CLDR-Users" <cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org>
> <cldr-users-bounces at unicode.org>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I asked "will" they be removed? and by that I mean will they get into svn
> repos or not?
>
> On 5/11/2015 9:43 PM, Shervin Afshar wrote:
> They are not removed. If I'm not mistaken in interpreting the resolution
> rules[1], they end up being marked as "provisional".
>
> [1]: *http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#resolution_procedure*
> <http://cldr.unicode.org/index/process#resolution_procedure>
>
> ↪ Shervin
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Mjbmr <*mjbmri at gmail.com*
> <mjbmri at gmail.com>> wrote:
> If we don't reach 4 votes till the end of ST close time, will they be
> removed?
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> *CLDR-Users at unicode.org* <CLDR-Users at unicode.org>
> *http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users*
> <http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
> http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/cldr-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/attachments/20150516/17bbde45/attachment.html>