Interpretation of pi-LA (Pali as in Laos)
Richard Wordingham
richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Tue Jun 9 12:13:22 CDT 2015
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 15:32:18 +0200
Mark Davis ☕️ <mark at macchiato.com> wrote:
> The script may result from the combination.
>
> In
> http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/supplemental/likely_subtags.html
> look for rows that have both a language and region (but no script),
> such as Azerbaijani.
There were a couple of entries in there that surprised me and I
still think the scripts are wrong in a few of these cases. Is there any
straightforward way of checking how they were derived? They are:
sga => sga_Ogam_IE ! Surely Latn is the main script for Old Irish
! (unless you want to count Latg)
non => non_Runr_SE ! I think Latn, but perhaps it depends on how you
! measure usage. I understood that most of the Old
! Norse material came from Iceland.
nod => nod_Lana_TH ! I think Thai - unless there has been a major shift
! recently.
Richard.
More information about the CLDR-Users
mailing list