<div dir="ltr">What's the semantic difference between the two sets? Without it, it's just different fonts.<div><br></div><div>Leo</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:00 AM A. Stötzner via Unicode <<a href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org">unicode@corp.unicode.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
Besides the simple typographic set of 12 zodiac characters there is a tradition of another set, consisting of pictographic symbols of the 12 zodiac signs, which also play a role in typography (~ 16th c. onwards)
</div>
<div>
Has this set been proposed for encoding at any time in the past?
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
greetings,
</div>
<div>
Andreas Stötzner
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<img style="max-width: 100%;" src="cid:ii_1913e7943b85379f3bc1" alt="">
</div>
<div> <span style="font-family:"times new roman",times">__________________________________________________________________</span>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div> <span style="font-family:"times new roman",times"><strong>Andreas Stötzner</strong> </span>
<br><span style="font-family:"times new roman",times;font-size:10pt">Gestaltung · Archivpflege · Fontentwicklung</span>
<br><span style="font-family:"times new roman",times;font-size:10pt">Klauflügelweg 21 · 88400 Biberach a.d. Riß</span>
<br><span style="font-family:"times new roman",times;font-size:10pt">0176-86823396 · <a href="mailto:as@signographie.de" target="_blank">as@signographie.de</a></span>
</div>
<div> <span style="font-family:"times new roman",times;font-size:10pt"><a href="mailto:post@andronfonts.com" target="_blank">post@andronfonts.com</a> · <a href="https://andronfonts.com/" target="_blank">Andronfonts.com</a><br></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>