<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">The first and last choice are arguably
not the most conventional representations for these. They are, at
best, fallbacks.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">A./<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/12/2024 12:31 AM, Marius Spix via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:trinity-5bbb355c-43d2-4165-8258-a9e34b2bf374-1712907082619@3c-app-webde-bs43">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;">
<div>For all these types of links existing characters can be
used:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>anchor links: U+00B6 ¶ PILCROW SIGN</div>
<div>
<div>local links: U+1F517 🔗 LINK SYMBOL</div>
<div>broken links (also known as red-links): U+26D3 U+200D
U+1F4A5 CHAINS + ZERO WIDTH JOINER + COLLISION SYMBOL</div>
<div>external links: U+2192 → RIGHTWARDS ARROW</div>
<div>
<div name="quote"
style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Gesendet:</b> Donnerstag,
11. April 2024 um 21:05 Uhr<br>
<b>Von:</b> "Asmus Freytag via Unicode"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org"><unicode@corp.unicode.org></a><br>
<b>An:</b> "Tom Moore" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tom.moore@microsoft.com"><tom.moore@microsoft.com></a>,
"Sławomir Osipiuk" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sosipiuk@gmail.com"><sosipiuk@gmail.com></a>, "Asmus
Freytag via Unicode" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org"><unicode@corp.unicode.org></a><br>
<b>Betreff:</b> Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: External Link Symbol</div>
<div name="quoted-content">On 4/11/2024 11:47 AM, Tom
Moore wrote:<br>
> Then multiply that by 2, for links that navigate
current tab vs. request to open a new tab.<br>
<br>
Is there a link to samples for all of these as used in
practice, or is<br>
this just a theoretical distinction?<br>
<br>
A./<br>
<br>
><br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: Unicode
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:unicode-bounces@corp.unicode.org"><unicode-bounces@corp.unicode.org></a> On Behalf Of
Slawomir Osipiuk via Unicode<br>
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 9:28 AM<br>
> To: asmusf <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:asmusf@ix.netcom.com"><asmusf@ix.netcom.com></a>; Asmus
Freytag via Unicode <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org"><unicode@corp.unicode.org></a><br>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: External Link Symbol<br>
><br>
> There are actually three kinds of links that are
distinguishable from each<br>
> other:<br>
><br>
> - A link to a different location in the current
document (anchor link/jump<br>
> link)<br>
> - A link to a resource on the same network/domain
as the current document (local link/relative link)<br>
> - A link to a resource on a different network
(external link)<br>
><br>
> All those can appear as symbols, used
contrastively, within a run of text.<br>
> I'm very surprised these haven't already been
encoded and that there is any controversy. The
consortium doesn't care much for precendent, but come
on, we have "play"and "eject" symbols encoded!<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>