<div dir="auto">Those are completely unrelated link symbols.</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 1:12 PM James Kass via Unicode <<a href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org">unicode@corp.unicode.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)"><br>
<br>
On 2024-04-10 3:45 PM, Peter Constable via Unicode wrote:<br>
><br>
> Who defines “right†in this case?<br>
><br>
> I agree the site could use improvement on this point, but the fix I <br>
> would propose is to use an image asset and not a character.<br>
><br>
<br>
This can be done in CSS:<br>
<a href="https://christianoliff.com/blog/styling-external-links-with-an-icon-in-css/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://christianoliff.com/blog/styling-external-links-with-an-icon-in-css/</a><br>
<br>
Since Unicode doesn't regard the symbol as text, perhaps any future <br>
proposal should treat it as an emoji. As Marius Spix pointed out, <br>
related link symbols already exist in Unicode.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>