<div dir='auto'>Unsubscribe </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 8, 2024 11:37 AM, James Kass via Unicode <unicode@corp.unicode.org> wrote:<br type="attribution" /><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">
<br>
<br>
On 2024-04-08 5:03 PM, Gabriel Tellez via Unicode wrote:
<br>
> Unicode rejected external link symbol... but then are left to use the
<br>
> wrong symbol on their own website. SMH
<br>
<br>
https://steemit.com/unicode/@markgritter/why-did-unicode-reject-the-external-link-symbol
<br>
<br>
The rejection reasoning quoted in the link above goes on to say that any
<br>
future proposal for the external link symbol would be considered if it
<br>
includes convincing evidence that the symbol is needed for plain-text
<br>
interchange.
<br>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div><br></div>